Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 47-51, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-781201

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To explore the relationship between MSX1 gene detection and tooth loss in a Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) family @* Methods @# DNA was extracted from the venous blood of 2 patients with dental hy⁃podontia in the 9th family of Van der Woude syndrome (VWS) families and 62 controls with complete dentition. Primers were designed for the MSXl gene. The coding regions of exons 1 and 2 of the MSX1 gene were amplified by PCR. The purified products of exons 1 and 2 of the MSX1 gene were sequenced and analyzed by sequence alignment @*Results@#The ivs2+68 C>T polymorphism in the MSX1 gene was found in the VWS9 members with tooth loss, and the VWS pa⁃tients with IRF6 gene mutations had increased tooth loss@* Conclusion@#Congenital tooth loss in the patients with con⁃genital missing teeth in VWS family 9 may be related to the ivs2 + 68 C> T polymorphism of the MSX1 gene.

2.
Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases ; (12): 236-240, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-819109

ABSTRACT

Objective@#To investigate the clinical effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) applied in guided bone regeneration (GBR) for severe bone deficiency in the anterior maxilla.@*Methods @#Forty patients with bone defects in the anterior maxilla were chosen to be treated with GBR, 20 patients were treated with CGF applied in GBR as the observation group, and the other 20 patients were treated only with GBR as the control group. The evaluation of wound healing was performed after the operation, and bone augmentation was evaluated half a year after the operation.@*Results@#The first-stage healing rate of soft tissue wounds in the observation group was 100% and 75% in the control group, and the primary healing rate in the observation group was better than that in the control group (P=0.017). The changes in bone width of the observation group were (3.70 ± 0.28) mm, and those of the control group were (2.96 ± 0.16) mm. The bone augmentation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P=0.000). @*Conclusion@#CGF applied in GBR has a good effect on bone augmentation for severe bone deficiency in the anterior maxilla.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL